Insights & Awareness
Knowledge That Builds Confidence.
A growing library of guides, explainers and awareness resources. Articles below are placeholders pending review and approval.
JUDICIAL UPDATES
Recent Legal Judgments
Stay informed about recent judicial decisions from the Rajasthan High Court and Supreme Court of India, presented for general knowledge and legal awareness.
FOR KNOWLEDGE & INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY
Rajasthan High Court
2026-10-05
Applicability of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to Scheduled Tribes
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 123/2025
The court held that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does not apply to members of Scheduled Tribes unless a specific notification is issued by the Central Government. The case involved a dispute over the validity of a marriage between two members of the Meena community.
Key Takeaway:
The Hindu Marriage Act's provisions are not automatically applicable to Scheduled Tribes, and their customary laws will govern marital disputes in the absence of a specific notification.
READ JUDGMENT →Rajasthan High Court
2026-10-12
Remarks against legal aid counsel
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 456/2026
The court expunged remarks made by a trial court against a legal aid counsel, emphasizing that such comments can be demoralizing and deter lawyers from taking up legal aid work. The court reiterated the importance of a supportive environment for legal aid providers.
Key Takeaway:
Judiciary should avoid making discouraging remarks against legal aid counsel to ensure the effectiveness of the legal aid system.
READ JUDGMENT →Rajasthan High Court
2026-10-18
Filling of reserved category vacancies
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 789/2024
The court directed the Rajasthan High Court administration to fill vacancies for the post of Junior Personal Assistant (English) from the reserved category list, stating that meritorious reserved category candidates cannot be denied appointment against general category seats.
Key Takeaway:
Reserved category candidates who score high enough to qualify for general category seats should be appointed under the general category, leaving the reserved seats for other candidates from the same category.
READ JUDGMENT →Rajasthan High Court
2026-10-22
Permission for foreign travel for medical treatment
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Pet.) No. 101/2026
The court granted permission to an accused in a criminal case to travel abroad for urgent medical surgery, balancing the right to health with the need to ensure the accused's presence during trial by imposing certain conditions.
Key Takeaway:
The right to receive medical treatment, including abroad, is a fundamental right, and courts can grant permission for foreign travel to an accused with appropriate conditions.
READ JUDGMENT →Rajasthan High Court
2026-10-28
Bail denial in Kanhaiya Lal murder case
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 202/2026
The court denied bail to one of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, considering the gravity of the offense and the evidence presented by the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
Key Takeaway:
In cases involving national security and heinous crimes, the courts are likely to take a strict view on bail applications.
READ JUDGMENT →Supreme Court of India
2026-10-03
Age determination in POCSO cases
Criminal Appeal No. 1234/2026
The Supreme Court overturned a High Court decision and acquitted a man convicted under the POCSO Act, after finding that the prosecutrix was not a minor at the time of the incident. The court emphasized the need for proper age determination.
Key Takeaway:
Accurate age determination is crucial in POCSO cases, and the benefit of the doubt regarding the victim's age may be given to the accused.
READ JUDGMENT →Supreme Court of India
2026-10-10
Land acquisition and compensation
Civil Appeal No. 5678/2025
The court held that once land is acquired and compensation is paid, the original landowners cannot claim a right to the land, even if it remains unused. The case involved a dispute over land acquired for a public purpose.
Key Takeaway:
Title to acquired land vests with the state once the acquisition process is complete and compensation is paid.
READ JUDGMENT →Supreme Court of India
2026-10-15
Medical negligence and standard of care
Civil Appeal No. 9101/2024
The court upheld a finding of medical negligence against a hospital, stating that the standard of care expected from a medical professional is that of a reasonably competent practitioner in that field.
Key Takeaway:
Hospitals and doctors are expected to adhere to a standard of care that is reasonable and accepted in the medical profession.
READ JUDGMENT →Supreme Court of India
2026-10-20
Right to pension for government employees
Civil Appeal No. 1121/2026
The court ruled that pension is a deferred salary and a vested right of a government employee, which cannot be denied without due process of law. The case involved a retired employee whose pension was withheld.
Key Takeaway:
Pension is not a bounty but a right earned by a government employee for past services.
READ JUDGMENT →Supreme Court of India
2026-10-25
Bail in Sahara money laundering case
Criminal Appeal No. 3344/2026
The Supreme Court granted bail to a former director of a Sahara group company in a money laundering case, considering the period of incarceration already undergone and the stage of the trial.
Key Takeaway:
Prolonged incarceration without the likelihood of a speedy trial can be a ground for granting bail, even in serious economic offenses.
READ JUDGMENT →Supreme Court of India
2026-10-30
Limitation for filing appeals under IBC
Civil Appeal No. 5566/2026
The court held that the period of limitation for filing an appeal to the NCLAT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, is 30 days, and the tribunal has the power to condone a delay of only 15 days.
Key Takeaway:
Strict adherence to the timelines prescribed under the IBC is essential for the timely resolution of insolvency proceedings.
READ JUDGMENT →The information presented here is intended solely for general knowledge, legal awareness and informational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers should refer to the original judgment or order for the authoritative legal position.
Begin the Conversation
Every Important Decision Deserves the Right Professional Support.
Whether you are an individual seeking guidance, a business navigating compliance, or an entrepreneur building something new, start with a conversation with our team.